If "Star Wars: Skywalker. The sunrise "criticized the exploitation of the audience nostalgia, which resulted in the mediocre Final" Skayuokers "," Star Wars: the last Jedi "is perceived as an evil twin, which went on the plan, who developed Jay Jay Abrams. Recall that to "Skywalker. The uprise "Abrams took off the" awakening of power ", while the production of the" last Jedi "was entrusted to Raan Johnson.
No matter whose approach is closer to you, it is impossible not to admit that Sicvel's trilogy lacks integrity: due to constant throwing from one side to another plot, it was too confused. We are unlikely to ever find out why Johnson decided to reduce some plot moves marked in the seventh episode, but his directorial decisions were puzzling even other members of the Lucasfilm production team. Thus, Mariann Brandon Edges and Mary Joe Mark criticized the picture of Johnson for rejecting Abrams's work out of the "Awakening of Power". Brandon said:
Yes, the "last Jedi" became a different look at the Saga "Star Wars". Raan is worth paying due to the fact that he remained faithful to himself. He wanted to deconstruct this story and move in a different direction. I know it is ambiguous, but isn't it good?
Star Wars: The Last Jedi | Director: Rian Johnson | DOP: Steve Yedlin pic.twitter.com/bl6acoarw8.
- Star Wars Holocron (@sw_holocron) April 12, 2020
The brands spoke more directly, doubted whether Johnson's approach was justified by:
It is very strange that the second film deliberately departed from the canvas designated in the first film. Sorry, but this is how it is perceived. At the same time, it does not seem to me that this can be said about the third film. He took over the rest of the second film, becoming an attempt to tell the story. I did not have the feeling that there was a conscious desire in him ... there was nothing like that.
Despite this, the "Last Jedies" had to taste many of their non-standardity, although in general the Trilogy-Sikvel causes mixed feelings from the audience.