To honor of Hollywood diva worth noting that every year they are all louder protest against the use of retouching - not all, but many are enough, especially if any GQ or Vogue with this very retouching is frankly, removing the stars extra kilograms and wrinkles or, For example, lightening the skin tone. In the meantime, glossy editions did not give up the embellishment of reality completely, we still have a chance to regain how the stars look on the covers - and in reality.
An exquisite Hollywood diva on the cover, in the life of Amanda, the saphride cannot boast of equally flawless skin, not glamorous hairstyle.
Angelina Jolie and in reality, and on the cover looks almost the same perfectly, but the design of the Cover of the Vanity Fair decided that the eyes of the actress should make a barrel - and "painted" their bright blue.
The singer Ariana Grande on the Cover Vogue is little similar to how it looks in everyday life.
Britney Spears, of course, but any cover is deprived of his albeit a few, but still extra kilograms.
Kate blanks on red walkways and in Glossa always looks flawless, but designers of this cover, apparently, nourish some special disgust for age wriggles.
It would seem that the young star "Harry Potter" Emma Watson does not need any adoration, however, the designers of this cover did not please her spicy freckles.
Eva Longoria on the cover and in reality looks very different - especially now, after the birth of the firstborn.
Heidi Klum rapidly approaches the half-century anniversary and therefore shots with supermodel "with full parade" and without makeup are two completely different women.
Jessica Alba in retouching needs less than others, but its image on the cover is still subjected to minimal, but processing.
Jessica Chesia in real life and on this highly artistic cover of the magazine W is two completely different women.
On the cover of Vogue, the supermodel Kara Middes looks like a sort of fatal diva, she looks like a completely ordinary girl in life.
Kate Moss in his 45 years can still give a certain goal of young stars, but the beach photos of the stars show that this phora is largely the merit of retouching, and not at all the model itself.
On this cover of the Edition of Interview Katy Perry tried the image of Amy Winehouse, in the life of the singer looks much easier.
Well, of course, the main lover of retouching all kinds of Kim Kardashian, who in ordinary life, very rarely, but still allows himself to appear on the street without makeup - and immediately becomes noticeable difference.
One of the main Favorits of the coming Oscar, Lady Gaga is known for its eccentric images, but in life the appearance of the singer is quite simple.
The creators of this cover of the magazine w for some reason decided to see how Miley Cyrus would look without an eyebrow. Who would have thought that the evil-plated eyebrows change the appearance of a person.
Natalie Portman in its 37 years retains almost perfect appearance, but additionally emphasize the features of the face of the actress on the cover with the help of retouching - it seems to be a sacred business.
Nicole Kidman in his 51 year gradually begins to play the struggle with aging, but the creators of the Cover of the Vanity Fair are struggling to recognize this.
Rita Ora on the cover and in real life looks very different.
Like Scarlett Johansson, which in reality can not boast of the same perfect porcelain face of the face and perfectness of the skin, as on the cover.
Another favorite of the current Oscar, the young Sirsha Ronan, on the cover and in reality also looks different, and in reality as the most ordinary girl, not a movie star and a favorite film.
The creators of this cover with the mind of the turman also diligently closed their eyes to the fact that the actress was already 48 years old.
