The ex-star "House 2" over the years has become an independent star - she and TV presenter, and singer, and media person, and one of the most influential domestic celebrities in Instagram. It would seem that Olga Buzova seemed to afford the services of first-class stylists - but, nevertheless, periodically still makes "fashionable" errors and appears in frankly unsuccessful, and then simply ridiculous images, for which any stylist would be ashamed.
Olya itself believes that "you can afford almost everything" - provided that the elements of the wardrobe are harmoniously combined with each other. For example, a blouse with a "tiger" print in combination with a skirt, unpacable reminiscent of someone's down jacket.
Посмотреть эту публикацию в InstagramПубликация от Ольга Бузова (@buzova86)
For this bikini, Buzovat criticized for a long time - rightly noting that the swimsuit itself is rather similar to the strips, which in the photoshop of the star "censors" their selfie.
Посмотреть эту публикацию в InstagramПубликация от Ольга Бузова (@buzova86)
"Triple" leather - and boots, and a dress, and a jacket from above - it seems a somewhat vulgar combination, "weighting" image
Посмотреть эту публикацию в InstagramПубликация от Ольга Бузова (@buzova86)
And this output is something unpacable reminds the cult "beauty" - and the comparison is not in favor of Buzova
Посмотреть эту публикацию в InstagramПубликация от Ольга Бузова (@buzova86)
Sometimes the concept of a la "" Expensive-richly "meets the" magnificent century "" also looks not so winning as I would like.
"Medal" in the most interesting place?
Посмотреть эту публикацию в InstagramПубликация от Ольга Бузова (@buzova86)
The image in the style of "Hi-two thousand" - Country meets Kristina Aguilera
This dress would be truly seductive, but all the case spoils the seams in the center of a transparent insert, the harsh outfit and the image as a whole
And, of course, how not to remember the extravagant appearance of Olga on the RU-TV Award
The publication is discussed and does not reflect the position of the editorial board.